#Readwise vs instapaper full
#Readwise vs instapaper android
#Readwise vs instapaper free

Their killer feature is that it embeds a bit of JS in the page to provide an in-browser overlay, so you don't have to leave the page you were reading and can highlight and add comments natively. Hypothesis is simply awesome and my favorite web annotation tool. While I don't blame it on Instapaper, this is a kind of thing that happens when you don't own your data and use a closed source product. One red flag was in 2018 when Instapaper wasn't available in Europe for few months until they resolved GDPR issues.

#Readwise vs instapaper full

Search function works for full text search in saved articles, but doesn't let you restrict search for highlights, and you can't search in notes at all. Highlights are only stored as text though (as opposed to CSS/xpath locators), so there is no easy way to match them against original text apart from some sort of fuzzy search. I'm using a fork of python wrapper to access it. Instapaper got Json API, through which you can access your saved articles, comments and highlights. Personally I'm happy to pay 3$ per month for premium version of such a decent product though in absence of good alternatives.

#Readwise vs instapaper free

Mind that free version of Instapaper has got 5 notes per month limit.

#Readwise vs instapaper android

The only reason I'm using it at all is that its Android app has got offline capabilities, so I would export to Instapaper things I want to read on the tube while I don't have connection and read/comment while offline. So, to read something in Instapaper, first you'll have to import the article into it (to unclutter and optimize it for reading).ĭue to this import process, you can only read and highlight in Instapaper's app, and you can only see your highlights there as well, which is its main limitation for me. Pocket screenshot of annotation interface.

Read-It-Later App Showdown: Instapaper vs.

Here are couple of recent extensive comparisons of Instapaper and Pocket, which feature screenshots and other aspects of Instapaper: fonts and article formatting) because it's not something I care much about, so you might be better off googling that for yourself, here I'll concentrate on annotating aspect. I won't go into Instapaper's readability capabilities (e.g. If you're getting impatient, you can skip straight to my comparison table. I'm going to review some of the tools I tried using and still using and highlight their different positive and negative aspects.

you can populate your TODO list and step up your spaced repetition game.

it serves as activity log if you are into #lifelogging.

Fiction books are not an exception: I tend to highlight use of language I liked, inspirational things, etc.

If I don't have any highlights, it probably means that the content was not interesting at all for me.

it's got social value if highlights are visible to other people (e.g.

it's easier to recommend content to other people because you can refer to specific moments or points you liked/disliked.

If I have annotations for that, I can quickly go through them and restore the context. In particular, often I'd run on something on the internet that I remember reading before. It's easier to recall the content I already read, I just skim through highlights and refresh the memory

the very act of spending conscious effort on highlighting and commenting helps to remember better.

I've become increasingly obsessed with this and these days ability to highlight when I read serves multiple purposes for me: That bothered me increasingly until I bought a Kindle which had 'highlight' functionality and virtual keyboard and I had discovered it to help a lot with recalling. I assume you want this too and wondering about the practical details.Īt some point in my life I realized I didn't remember most of the books/papers/posts/videos I had consumed few years before.įor brevity I'll just refer to all of this as 'content' further on I won't try to convince you that my method of reading and interacting with information is superior for you: it doesn't have to be, and there are people out there more eloquent than me who do that. In this post I'm gonna elaborate on all of that and give some motivation, review of these tools (mainly with the focus on open source thus extendable software) and my vision on how they could work in an ideal world. My automated scripts use them to render these annotations in human readable and searchable plaintext and generate TODOs/ spaced repetition items. I've programmed data providers that parse them and provide nice interface to interact with this data from other tools. TLDR: when I read I try to read actively, which for me mainly involves using various tools to annotate content: highlight and leave notes as I read.